Scheduling Conference set for 11:00 AM in McKinleyville, Telephone Conference Only before Magistrate Judge Robert M. PLEASE NOTE: Persons granted access to court proceedings held by telephone or videoconference are reminded that photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings, including screenshots or other visual copying of a hearing, is absolutely prohibited. San Francisco Sheriff's OfficeĬLERK'S NOTICE Scheduling Conference set for 11:00 AM in McKinleyville, Telephone Conference Only before Magistrate Judge Robert M. There is no document associated with this entry.) (glm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on )ġ:19-cv-00329-RMI - Vincent v. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. PLEASE NOTE: Persons granted access to court proceedings held by telephone or videoconference are reminded that photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings,including screenshots or other visual copying of a hearing, is absolutely prohibited. For call clarity, parties shall NOT use speaker phone or earpieces for these calls, and where at all possible, parties shall use landlines. Therefore, mute your phone if possible and wait for the Court to address you before speaking on the line. The Court may be in session with proceedings in progress when you connect to the conference line. The court circulates the following conference number to allow the equivalent of a public hearing by telephone.Īll counsel, members of the public and press please use the following dial-in information below to access the conference line: This proceeding will be held by AT&T Conference Line. The court will inquire of such at the hearing. Accordingly, the parties are instructed to meet and confer prior to the hearing and engage in a good faith effort to resolve the issues. It appears from a brief review of the letters that most, if not all, of the issues presented can and should be resolved by the parties without court intervention. 93, 94 and 96) set for 10:00 AM in McKinleyville, Telephone Conference Only before Magistrate Judge Robert M. AGA Service Company et alĬLERK'S NOTICE: Discovery Hearing (Dkts. advisors in that process.Notice Regarding Press and Public Access to Court Hearings Information on Observing Court Proceedings Held by VideoconferenceĤ:20-cv-06304-JST - Elgindy et al v. Finally, the article traces the goals of successive Chinese governments to exercise more control over the currency of modern China and the role of u.s. Congress approved as had been the case in the early 1900s. The article demonstrates the long-standing interest of the United States in Chinese currency reform and shows how, in the 1920s, this interest often manifested itself in the interactions between Chinese officials and conduits like Hewitt and Kemmerer, rather than monetary missions that the u.s. advisors, particularly mint technician Clifford Hewitt and Princeton University professor Edwin Kemmerer, in debates about whether China should adopt the gold-exchange standard or stay on the silver standard, as well as their role in the elimination of the silver tael (liang) as a unit of account. The article highlights the importance of u.s. It focuses on the period immediately preceding the well-known Silver Purchase Act of 1934 and the Nationalist government’s decision to abandon the silver standard in favor of a managed currency, the fabi, in November 1935. This article uses primary sources from China, Taiwan, and the United States to chronicle the history of the Shanghai Mint and u.s.–China monetary interactions during the 1920s and early 1930s.
0 kommentar(er)
